While safety improvements might have been made to our streets in recent years, transport studies also show declines in pedestrian (行人) mobility, especially among young children. Many parents say there’s too much traffic on the roads for their children to walk safely to school, so they pack them into the car instead.
Dutch authors Thalia Verkade and Marco te Brömmelstroet are bothered by facts like these. In their new book Movement: How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives, they call for a rethink of our streets and the role they play in our lives.
Life on city streets started to change decades ago. Whole neighbourhoods were destroyed to make way for new road networks and kids had to play elsewhere. Some communities fought back. Most famously, a Canadian journalist who had moved her family to Manhattan in the early 1950s led a campaign to stop the destruction of her local park. Describing her alarm at its proposed replacement with an expressway, Jane Jacobs called on her mayor (市长) to champion “New York as a decent place to live, and not just rush through.” Similar campaigns occurred in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s as well.
Although these campaigns were widespread, the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car. The number of cars on roads has been increasing rapidly. In Australia we now have over twenty million cars for just over twenty-six million people, among the highest rate of car ownership in the world.
We invest a lot in roads that help us rush through, but we fail to account for the true costs. Do we really recognise what it costs us as a society when children can’t move safely around our communities? The authors of Movement have it right: it’s time to think differently about that street outside your front door.
8. What phenomenon does the author point out in paragraph 1?
A. Cars often get stuck on the road. B. Traffic accidents occur frequently.
C. People walk less and drive more. D. Pedestrians fail to follow the rules.
9. What were the Canadian journalist and other campaigners trying to do?
A. Keep their cities livable. B. Promote cultural diversity.
C. Help the needy families. D. Make expressways accessible.
10. What can be inferred about the campaigns in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s?
A. They boosted the sales of cars. B. They turned out largely ineffective.
C. They won government support. D. They advocated building new parks.
11. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A. Why the Rush? B. What’s Next?
C. Where to Stay? D. Who to Blame?
【答案】8. C 9. A 10. B 11. A
该题有详细解析可以查阅1、本网站所提供的信息，只供教育教学参考之用。
2、本网站及其会员一概毋须以任何方式就任何信息传递或传送的失误、不准确或错误对用户或任何其他人士负任何直接或间接的责任。
3、在法律允许的范围内，本网站在此声明,不承担用户或任何人士就使用或未能使用本网站所提供的信息或任何链接或项目所引致的任何直接、间接、附带、从属、特殊、惩罚性或惩戒性的损害赔偿。
4、访问者在从事与本网站相关的所有行为(包括但不限于访问浏览、利用、转载、宣传介绍)时，必须以善意且谨慎的态度行事；访问者不得故意或者过失的损害本网站的各类合法权益，不得利用本网站以任何方式直接或者间接的从事违反中华人民共和国法律、国际公约以及社会公德的行为。对于访问者利用本网站提供的信息而作出的任何决策、决定以及其后果，本网站不承担任何责任
5、本网站图片，文字之类版权，本网站无法鉴别所上传图片或文字的知识版权，如果侵犯，请及时通知我们，本网站将在第一时间及时删除。
6、凡以任何方式登录本网站或直接、间接使用本网站资料者，视为自愿接受本网站声明的约束。
GYEDU
